Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++

[Alan Shutko]

James Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> OTOH, these standards documents aren't the most readable of text. Perhaps
> a human-friendly explanation of the standard would be more widely read?

The problem with a more human-friendly explanation of the standard is
that then you're not reading the standard, you're reading something
that may be wrong.  (http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/schildt.html) The
whole point of reading the standard is to know exactly what is or
isn't in it, and translating that leads to less confidence in the
results.

-- 
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
42 days, 15 hours, 42 minutes, 35 seconds till we run away.
Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/