On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Horst von Brand wrote: > > This is exactly what Linus meant when he said he doesn't want an in-kernel > > debugger: Dumb it down, and you select dumber hackers, and the result is a mess. > > <slow-news-night-mode on> So you must be in favor of removing all > comments from the kernel source, in order to select even less dumb > hackers? <jaded> What makes you think that lack of comments would stop the dumb ones? </jaded> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux kernel modules... Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux kernel modules... Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux kernel modules... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules dev... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
- Re: Linux kernel modules developm... Martin Dalecki
- Re: Linux kernel modules dev... Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules developm... Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux kernel modules dev... Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules dev... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules... Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux kernel modules dev... Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
- Re: Linux kernel modules developm... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C... Jes Sorensen
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Stephen Williams
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Horst von Brand
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Justin . Skists
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts