> > Nothing. What I was saying if you want some OO language in the kernel, C++ > > is the only option I guess. Mixing languages is a pain.. > > There is no such thing as "OO language". There is OO style and there are > ways to use it when you are writing in almost any language. And OO in C is > not harder than OO in C++, provided that you are not trying to write in > C++ and translate line-by-line into C. I meant to say : Language that had operations etc., that make implementing a OO design a bit easier to do. Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Erik Mouw
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Matti Aarnio
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Martin Dalecki
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C... Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C... Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C... Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Igmar Palsenberg