On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 05:11:35PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Linus, > > > Where do architecture maintainers stand when they don't submit their > > problems to linux-kernel or the great Ted Bug List(tm)? > > Up against the wall so we can shoot them? I know that was a joke, but it's a good question. I know PPC still has some issues that need to be sorted out (We got lots of PCI resource collisions on most(all?) new machines, which really shouldn't be). I'm sure other arches have problems which haven't been posted on l-k but have been on their respective -dev list. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Mark Orr
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 ebi4
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Michael Peddemors
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Dr. Kelsey Hudson
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Russell King
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Woodhouse
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Pavel Machek
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 James Lewis Nance
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Woodhouse
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rogier Wolff
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen