[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Note that with most versions of gcc this is all a complete non-issue, > as most versions of gcc will _always_ inline a function that the user > has asked to be inlined. So the issue seldom actually comes up. I thought that 'extern inline' was in fact the intended usage. That way, if gcc decides it's not going to obey our explicit instruction to inline a certain function, we get to know about it. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Dr. Kelsey Hudson
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Russell King
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Woodhouse
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Pavel Machek
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 James Lewis Nance
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Woodhouse
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rogier Wolff
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- inlines [was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9... suckfish
- RE: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Dunlap, Randy
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Horst von Brand
- RE: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Dunlap, Randy
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 schwidefsky
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Weinehall