On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Note that with most versions of gcc this is all a complete non-issue, > > as most versions of gcc will _always_ inline a function that the user > > has asked to be inlined. So the issue seldom actually comes up. > > I thought that 'extern inline' was in fact the intended usage. That way, if > gcc decides it's not going to obey our explicit instruction to inline a > certain function, we get to know about it. And what could we do about it? Basically nothing. So we might as well use "static inline". Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Dr. Kelsey Hudson
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Russell King
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Woodhouse
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Pavel Machek
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 James Lewis Nance
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Woodhouse
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rogier Wolff
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- inlines [was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9... suckfish
- RE: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Dunlap, Randy
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Horst von Brand
- RE: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Dunlap, Randy
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 schwidefsky
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Weinehall
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Cort Dougan