Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:21:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > The hardest problem: how do you do the block read? Possibilities: > > > > - Ignore the problem, use normal block device I/O > > - Use the real mode bios, needs V86 support > > And it requires a sync before every possible crash to ensure cache > coherency (assuming you want to access the same ext2 without the debugger > as well) So you basically cannot buffer writes to that source code. The rule is: no writing to the source code while you are debugging. Only write to the source code when you also plan to compile it. You can unmount your source code partition when you start the debugger. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Timur Tabi
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugge... Frederic Magniette
- Re: The case for a standard kernel deb... Andrew Morton
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Keith Owens
- Re: The case for a standard k... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kernel deb... Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standard k... Andi Kleen
- Re: The case for a standard k... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standard k... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard k... Jeff V. Merkey
- RE: The case for a standard kernel debugger Howell, David P
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore
- Linux RAS Keith Owens
- Re: Linux RAS Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux RAS Matt D. Robinson
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Karim Yaghmour
- RE: The case for a standard kernel debugger Howell, David P
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore