Yes, we looked at that and it didn't seem to provide the generality we needed - multipe exits registered per hook, ability to arm a set of hooks atomically, ability to prioritise dispatching order of a hook exit, MP complient. I may be wrong but the Linux Trace Toolkit hooks like like they were specifically designed to cater for inserting static tracepoints into the kernel. Richard Moore - RAS Project Lead - Linux Technology Centre (PISC). http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux Office: (+44) (0)1962-817072, Mobile: (+44) (0)7768-298183 IBM UK Ltd, MP135 Galileo Centre, Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, UK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: The case for a standard ker... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standard ker... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard ker... Jeff V. Merkey
- RE: The case for a standard kernel debugger Howell, David P
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore
- Linux RAS Keith Owens
- Re: Linux RAS Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux RAS Matt D. Robinson
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Karim Yaghmour
- RE: The case for a standard kernel debugger Howell, David P
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Karim Yaghmour
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Karim Yaghmour
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Karim Yaghmour
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore