Frederic Magniette wrote: > > This can be really awful if your code is called very often and then saturate the > logs. One trick you can pull is: if (current->uid == 9999) printk(stuff); and then exercise the offending code path as user 9999. It works for some things. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- The case for a standard kernel debugger Keith Owens
- The case for a standard kernel debugger Keith Owens
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Timur Tabi
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugge... Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard kernel deb... Frederic Magniette
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Andrew Morton
- Re: The case for a standard k... Keith Owens
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard k... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standa... Andi Kleen
- Re: The case for a standa... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- RE: The case for a standard kernel debugger Howell, David P
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore