Frederic Magniette wrote:
>
> This can be really awful if your code is called very often and then saturate the
> logs.
One trick you can pull is:
if (current->uid == 9999)
printk(stuff);
and then exercise the offending code path as user 9999. It
works for some things.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- The case for a standard kernel debugger Keith Owens
- The case for a standard kernel debugger Keith Owens
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Timur Tabi
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugge... Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard kernel deb... Frederic Magniette
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Andrew Morton
- Re: The case for a standard k... Keith Owens
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard k... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standa... Andi Kleen
- Re: The case for a standa... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- RE: The case for a standard kernel debugger Howell, David P
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore

