Hi, Also their answer to the "Why isn't there a device /dev/xyz within a > guest?" question in the FAQ (http://tinyurl.com/4y8mhc) isn't > encouraging for anyone concerned about enough segregation between the > guests. Even though I control all software on the physical server I'd > rather try to have better separation separate among the guests.
Don't get me wrong. I like the idea - single kernel, effective CPU utilization even on commodity hardware, shared memory between the vservers. It is the implementation that should be improved. -- Arie
