Actually, there is a company that does Israeli ISP rating. Their metrics are
more performance and reliability oriented, but I don't see why they can't
add block-IPs as a metric, at least in principle....

http://www.marnetics.com/ISPrating.asp

Disclaimer: I have no interest, commercial or otherwise in this company. I
have never used their service, and have no idea regarding the quality of
their data, or lack of thereof.

        Cheers,

                Rony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arik Baratz
> Sent: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: AOL doesn't accept mail - free relaying of email
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> AB>> And they should. They should suffer for choosing an ISP that
> AB>> disrespects its own acceptable use policy, and gets itself into
> AB>> some kind of blackhole or another. What the customer must do is
>
> > Oh come on. It is a common knowledge that at least some of these relays
> > are too quick to add whole netblocks and too slow to explain
> why they did
> > that or how to make this not happen again. And the ISP couldn't
> care less
> > what some freak out there thinks about its policies - its responcibility
> > is its own paying clients and not convinvcing some
> trigger-happy sysadmin
> > jumping out of his pants to be BOFH-like and blacklist whatever possible
> > without too much investigation.
>
> As I see it, depending on who you are and how important it is for
> your messages to get 'there'.
>
> If you're a corporate and contact mostly other corporates, mostly
> you don't care. I know I don't. If someone from my company wants
> to send mail to someone with an RBL that doesn't let my static IP
> (I don't use the IP relay, heavens forbid) send him mail - I'm
> fine with that. The person on the other side will have to find a
> way to accept this mail message, because it's also his priority
> to do business with us.
>
> If you're a private person, or contact mostly private people,
> that's damn annoying. In the rare occasions I have encountered it
> I opted to use a different provider to send a message telling
> that person that they are using an RBL and he should do something
> about it.
>
> Personally I use a BezeqInt ISDN line to send and receive email,
> and it seems like this IP range is pretty much okay. I had it
> blocked once, and the BezeqInt guys went out of their way to un-block it.
>
> But BezeqInt is guilty of spamming me themselves, for which I did
> never forgive them. I have stopped buying new services from them
> and I am slowly switching.
>
> There should really be an Israeli ISP monitoring site, which will
> score ISPs based on their non-blackholeness, but I am not the one
> who will set it up so I have no right to speak about it.
>
> You're right about RBL admins that are too trigger happy, but I
> never encountered a case when I asked to be removed (when I had
> my own address range) and not removed within a few days. Yes,
> some ignoramus has misconfigured a mail server on my range, and I
> picked up the pieces.
>
> And regarding the ISP's responsibility for the customer - the
> quick BezeqInt reaction came after I have told them that since I
> use their network to send email, and it is important to me that
> the email gets there, I hold them responsible for any blackholing
> of their range and will switch if I can't send my email decently
> from my equipment.
>
> -- Arik
>
> ======================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to