On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:27:16 +0000 Haiyang Zhang wrote: > > > We selected tc-htb for our current use case because we plan to support > > > multiple speed classes in the future. > > > > Which net-shapers also support. > > Thanks for pointing that out... > But for easier usage with existing tc tool for customers, can we still > use tc-htb offload? Does using tc-htb offload for speed clamping break > any coding convention or API specs?
The only spec here is that the offloaded version is supposed to look like the non-offloaded one. I really don't see how you can claim that static single class HTB is a accurate offload of HTB.
