> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 8:19 PM
> To: Erni Sri Satya Vennela <er...@linux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiya...@microsoft.com>; wei....@kernel.org; Dexuan Cui
> <de...@microsoft.com>; andrew+net...@lunn.ch; da...@davemloft.net;
> eduma...@google.com; pab...@redhat.com; Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>;
> Konstantin Taranov <kotara...@microsoft.com>; ho...@kernel.org;
> mhkli...@outlook.com; pasha.tatas...@soleen.com;
> kent.overstr...@linux.dev; brett.cree...@amd.com;
> schakraba...@linux.microsoft.com; shradhagu...@linux.microsoft.com;
> ssen...@linux.microsoft.com; ros...@gmail.com; Paul Rosswurm
> <paul...@microsoft.com>; linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] net: mana: Add sched HTB offload
> support
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:48:30 -0700 Erni Sri Satya Vennela wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 05:03:49PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 23:33:39 -0700 Erni Sri Satya Vennela wrote:
> > > > This controller can offload only one HTB leaf.
> > >
> > We selected tc-htb for our current use case because we plan to support
> > multiple speed classes in the future.
>
> Which net-shapers also support.
Thanks for pointing that out...
But for easier usage with existing tc tool for customers, can we still
use tc-htb offload? Does using tc-htb offload for speed clamping break
any coding convention or API specs?
Thanks,
- Haiyang
