On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:14 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:23:54PM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 11 August 2010 15:12, Igor Chudov wrote: >>>> ... >>>> When I need a 3-node cluster I'll think about those. Until then, 2.1.4 is >>>> not >>>> perfect but it works well enough. >>> >>> My heartbeat is 3.0.3. >>> >>> Do you think that, say, 2.1.4 s sufficiently bug free that I could >>> install it from source and just let it run forever? >> >> You won't gain anything by downgrading to 2.1.4. >> >> The pacemaker/CRM is not easy on newcomers and the learning curve >> is quite steep, unfortunately. However, the Heartbeat v1 is not >> supported anymore by the developers, though you can still get >> some help from the community. > > the problem isn't heartbeat v1, and it's not even the v1 style config. > > the problem he's having is simply figuring out what heartbeat is doing. the > logs > aren't showing anything (including failures), which makes it incredibly > difficult to troubleshoot.
Yes. It may not be a failure or a bug of heartbeat. But I just have no idea what does not work. It is not a situation where I can have a lot of trust in what is going on. i _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
