Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:21:33PM +0000, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
> I had a poke about the RPMs and don't think this really is a CentOS issue.
>
> In the tarball for heartbeat-2.1.2 we have a spec file:
>
> Packager: Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> and later on:
>
> ./configure '--prefix=/usr' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--localstatedir=/var'
> '--with-group-id=90' '--with-ccmuser-id=90' '--disable-rpath'
> '--libexecdir=/usr/lib64' '--libdir=/usr/lib64' '--disable-ansi'
> '--enable-mgmt' '--enable-bu
> ndled_ltdl' 'CFLAGS= -fno-unit-at-a-time' --enable-ltdl-convenience
>
> and even later on:
>
> if
> getent group haclient >/dev/null
> then
> : OK group haclient already present
> else
> GROUPOPT="-g 90"
Both uid and gid are set to 90 in the original sources. However,
various distributions/platforms are of course free to change it.
> >From the tarball for 213 we have in the same spec file:
Which tarball do you refer to?
> %define HA_CCMUID 498
> %define HA_APIGID 496
This may be set in the specfile, but not in the original one.
Whoever did the specfile must've done this on purpose.
Thanks,
Dejan
> and later
>
> if
> getent group %{HA_APIGROUP} >/dev/null
> then
> : OK group %{HA_APIGROUP} already present
> else
> GROUPOPT="-g %{HA_APIGID}"
>
>
> So I think the change came from the heartbeat project....
>
> On 2/12/08, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 12, 2008, at 3:14 PM, David Lee wrote:
> >
> > > A few weeks ago a colleague installed heartbeat, via yum, on CentOS
> > > (fresh
> > > machine). He got "heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el5.centos" (i.e. a 2.1.2
> > > variant)
> > > and it gave both uid and gid as 90.
> > >
> > > Earlier today I have done a similar exercise on (also on a fresh
> > > machine).
> > > I got (the newer) "heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos" (2.1.3 variant). But
> > > that gave uid 498 and gid 496. (And for local reasons that causes
> > > grief.)
> > >
> > > My guess is that this disparity is something to do with CentOS
> > > revising
> > > their packaging. If so, any ideas who I should contact? Any ideas
> > > why
> > > CentOS chose such high numbers for their uid/gid?
> >
> > can you let me know when you find out the official [ug]id's?
> > i'll make sure the build service packages use them too
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
>
>
> --
> R.I.Pienaar
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
