A few weeks ago a colleague installed heartbeat, via yum, on CentOS (fresh machine). He got "heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el5.centos" (i.e. a 2.1.2 variant) and it gave both uid and gid as 90.
Earlier today I have done a similar exercise on (also on a fresh machine). I got (the newer) "heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos" (2.1.3 variant). But that gave uid 498 and gid 496. (And for local reasons that causes grief.) My guess is that this disparity is something to do with CentOS revising their packaging. If so, any ideas who I should contact? Any ideas why CentOS chose such high numbers for their uid/gid? -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : UNIX Team Leader Durham University : : South Road : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ Durham DH1 3LE : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. : _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
