On Feb 12, 2008, at 3:14 PM, David Lee wrote:
A few weeks ago a colleague installed heartbeat, via yum, on CentOS
(fresh
machine). He got "heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el5.centos" (i.e. a 2.1.2
variant)
and it gave both uid and gid as 90.
Earlier today I have done a similar exercise on (also on a fresh
machine).
I got (the newer) "heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos" (2.1.3 variant). But
that gave uid 498 and gid 496. (And for local reasons that causes
grief.)
My guess is that this disparity is something to do with CentOS
revising
their packaging. If so, any ideas who I should contact? Any ideas
why
CentOS chose such high numbers for their uid/gid?
can you let me know when you find out the official [ug]id's?
i'll make sure the build service packages use them too
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
