indeed, you're right, for noble the scheme is v255: $ diff udevadm-bookworm.txt udevadm-noble.txt 1,3c1,3 < P: /devices/pci0000:64/0000:64:02.0/0000:65:00.0/net/eno1 < M: eno1 < R: 1 --- > P: /devices/pci0000:64/0000:64:02.0/0000:65:00.0/net/eno1np0 > M: eno1np0 > R: 0 6c6 < E: DEVPATH=/devices/pci0000:64/0000:64:02.0/0000:65:00.0/net/eno1 --- > E: DEVPATH=/devices/pci0000:64/0000:64:02.0/0000:65:00.0/net/eno1np0 8c8 < E: INTERFACE=eno1 --- > E: INTERFACE=eno1np0 10,12c10,12 < E: USEC_INITIALIZED=9532302 < E: NVME_HOST_IFACE=none < E: ID_NET_NAMING_SCHEME=v252 --- > E: USEC_INITIALIZED=4943568 > E: ID_NET_DRIVER=i40e > E: ID_NET_NAMING_SCHEME=v255 15d14 < E: ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD=eno1 17c16,17 < E: ID_NET_NAME_PATH=enp101s0f0 --- > E: ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD=eno1np0 > E: ID_NET_NAME_PATH=enp101s0f0np0 24a25 > E: ID_MM_CANDIDATE=1 27d27 < E: ID_NET_DRIVER=i40e 29,30c29,31 < E: ID_NET_NAME=eno1 < E: SYSTEMD_ALIAS=/sys/subsystem/net/devices/eno1 --- > E: ID_NET_NAME=eno1np0 > E: NM_UNMANAGED=1 > E: SYSTEMD_ALIAS=/sys/subsystem/net/devices/eno1np0
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 1:27 PM Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de> wrote: > > Can you compare the udevadm info output during installation time with > the udevadm info of the new system? > I guess Ubuntu uses a different systemd version (maybe newer) or some > udev rules for renaming the network devices are different than those > of Debian. In the output below you can see ID_NET_NAMING_SCHEME=v252, > maybe in Ubuntu it's newer. > > -- > regards Thomas
