On 13/07/14 15:21, David Kastrup wrote: > James <pkx1...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Helge Kruse <helge.kr...@gmx.net> writes: >>> >>>> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup: >>>> >>>>> <fis a d fis>4<f! a d f!> <f a d f> q >>>>> Well, just write the latter version. >>>> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord". >>> Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear. >>> >>>> My example has a fourth chord. Without it the latter version doesn't >>>> have any q. >>>> >>>>> It appears I have >>>>> mentioned this when entering issue 3593 as having _also_ been discussed, >>>>> illustrating how important the bug squad is for not letting reports get >>>>> dropped silently. >>>>> >>>> So is this considered as a bug? Since #3593 is closed it should be >>>> recorded as a new bug? >>> With q, it is more of an enhancement request. With >>> Completion_heads_engraver, it is more of a bug than a limitation because >>> you cannot really work around it. >>> >>> Both are separate requests concerning separate code. >>> >> I am just not really understanding what technically these are as the >> thread talks about 'note splitting' and the like and this thread talks >> about repeated chords/notes using 'q'. >> >> So if you could give me some appropriate tracker titles, I can hunt down >> the relevant threads and create the trackers more quickly. > For q this thread is, as far as I remember, first mention. For > Completion_heads_engraver, there was the thread explicitly mentioned in > the issue description of issue 3593. > > With Completion_heads_engraver the issue might be called > "Completion_heads_engraver should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals" > > I think the thread for that also mentioned articulations, but those are > probably trickier: you'd likely want a tie/slur begin to move to the > last generated note, but keep fingerings/text scripts on the first, and > stuff like manual beams make my head hurt. The first approximation > would likely just drop all articulations on repeated notes. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4011
> For q (chord repeats), there is just one issue. > > "chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals". That's > pretty straightforward. > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4010 James _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
