Helge Kruse <helge.kr...@gmx.net> writes: > Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup: > >> <fis a d fis>4<f! a d f!> <f a d f> q >> Well, just write the latter version. > Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord".
Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear. > My example has a fourth chord. Without it the latter version doesn't > have any q. > >> It appears I have >> mentioned this when entering issue 3593 as having _also_ been discussed, >> illustrating how important the bug squad is for not letting reports get >> dropped silently. >> > So is this considered as a bug? Since #3593 is closed it should be > recorded as a new bug? With q, it is more of an enhancement request. With Completion_heads_engraver, it is more of a bug than a limitation because you cannot really work around it. Both are separate requests concerning separate code. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
