2014-04-21 16:40 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski <karo...@wp.pl>: > Harm, > > this change is related to issue 621: > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=621 > > Now, I do not accept this solution. It is simply against the rules. > DynamicText shouldn't have influence on spacaing. Therefore I prefer whiteout. > > So I use: > > \context { > \Staff > \override DynamicText.extra-spacing-width = #'(+inf.0 . -inf.0) > }
Ahh, ok. Now I understand your remark here http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-04/msg00204.html The following will give different result for extra-spacing-width depending on presence of spanbars: \version "2.19.4" dynamic-text-extra-spacing-width-info = \override DynamicText.after-line-breaking = #(lambda (grob) (newline)(write (ly:grob-property grob 'extra-spacing-width))) m = \new Staff { c1 \dynamic-text-extra-spacing-width-info c\f } << \m \m >> \new StaffGroup << \m \m >> Will look in the whiteout-function ... Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
