Hi Jan-Peter, Thanks for the detailed response!
> I will answer more , when I left all infections behind, which my > children brought from school and kindergarten … =\ Although my 3½ year old daughter has had several bouts of “day-care-itis” — and my wife picked it up several times — I’ve fortunately avoided all sickness this season. > a) The "my" is the first part of an arbitrary identification part of the > engraver. In fact "\editionEngraver" is a scheme function, which returns > an engraver with the given id-path. So it might be > \consists \editionEngraver kierens.great.musical So the ‘test’ in '\addEdition test’ is not related to the ‘test’ in ‘my.test’? > b) The "Staff.A" is added to the path by the engraver on initialization. > The engraver adds the context-name to the id-path, which is in this case > "Staff", and then adds a counter, which is in fact a letter, so that we > can use dot-notation: "kierens.great.musical.Staff.1" will not parse, > but "kierens.great.musical.Staff.A" will. OK. > c) With "\editionEngraver ##f" an engraver is created, which searches > the parental contexts for an id and inherits the id. OK. I will try again, given this new information. Thanks! Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
