Hi Jan-Peter,
> - if you use it without any template mechanism, you have to assign
> proper edition-engraver id-paths - I can't say, what that means in
> production.
> - right now it is just ripped out of my working framework and might or
> might not work as expected ... but this doesn't need to be called a
> drawback, but a challenge ;)
Are you interested in taking up that challenge? =)
I would love a dead-simple, drop-in solution which would require minimal
adjustments to a score in order for it to accept “edition tweaks”. I tried to
adapt your example (see below), but had a few difficulties, and gave up quickly
because of the time constraints I was under at the time — I am now much freer,
and would love to take this to the goal line.
%%%% BEGIN
\version "2.18.0"
\include "edition-engraver.ly"
\addEdition test
% color the notehead red on the second quarter in the second measure
\editionMod test 2 1/4 my.test.Staff.A \once \override NoteHead #'color = #red
% destroy the slur starting on the second quarter in the first measure
\editionMod test 1 2/4 my.test.Staff.A \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 1)(0 . -1)(0 . 0))
Slur
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\consists \editionEngraver my.test
}
}
music = \relative c'' { c4 bes a( g) f e d c }
\new Staff \with { \consists \editionEngraver my.test }
\new Voice \with { \consists \editionEngraver ##f } \music
%%%% END
It looks dead simple… but (a) I don’t understand what the “my” is, nor where
“Staff.A” comes from, nor why you need to \consist a ##f engraver in the Voice,
etc.
Start with a simpler (pseudo-)example:
%%%% BEGIN
\version "2.18.0"
\include "edition-engraver.ly"
\addEdition editionA
% color the notehead red on the second quarter in the second measure
\editionMod editionA 2 1/4 Staff.Singer \once \override NoteHead #'color = #red
% destroy the slur starting on the second quarter in the first measure
\editionMod editionA 1 2/4 Staff.Singer \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 1)(0 . -1)(0 .
0)) Slur
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\consists \editionEngraver editionA
}
}
music = \relative c'' { c4 bes a( g) f e d c }
\new Staff = “Singer" \with { \consists \editionEngraver editionA } \music
%%%% END
Why is something like that not possible?
n.b. I'm invoking Occam’s Razor here: I’ll happily accept more complexity only
if it is required for greater power. ;)
Thanks,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
