2013/11/24 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2013/11/24 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >>> Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> This is mentioned in >>>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes >>>> - is that example not clear enough? How should we improve it? >>> >>> Maybe an interface that's easier to remember? >>> >>> \beforeBreak \shape ... >>> \afterBreak \shape ... >>> \shape ... ( >>> >>> with the ability to leave off any specification and/or use any order of >>> \shape commands. Yes, that's clearly not 2.18 material. But probably >>> worth thinking about. >> >> Interesting idea, but what about slurs that are broken multiple times? > > \beforeBreak #1 \shape ...
Ok, that's indeed quite user-friendly. I suggest to look at this after 2.18 is out - possibly together with merging my \shape improvements that i'm going to announce today. best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
