Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > This is mentioned in > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes > - is that example not clear enough? How should we improve it?
Maybe an interface that's easier to remember? \beforeBreak \shape ... \afterBreak \shape ... \shape ... ( with the ability to leave off any specification and/or use any order of \shape commands. Yes, that's clearly not 2.18 material. But probably worth thinking about. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
