Hi, David!
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:40 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Madoka Machitani <madok...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Now, is it correct to assume you are trying to achieve something like
> > this? \insMark "a" musical-sequence
> >
> > If so, the function would be:
> >
> > insMark =
> > #(define-music-function (parser location mark mus)
> > (markup? ly:music?)
> > (set! (ly:music-property mus 'elements)
> > (cons (make-music 'MarkEvent 'label mark)
> > (ly:music-property mus 'elements)))
> > mus)
> >
> > This is a crude example and won't work with single note events like c'4
>
> Why wouldn't you do
>
> insMark =
> #(define-music-function (parser location mark mus)
> (markup? ly:music?)
> #{ \mark #mark #mus #})
>
> instead? Note that depending on the version, #mark and/or #mus might
> need to be $mark or $mus instead.
>
> Ah, yes, I should have done that way (and was aware of that notation) but
Stjepan
mentioned things like cons and ly: function, so I did the hard way :)
--
Madoka
P.S.
I've recently switched from MuseScore so I'm a Lilypond newbie, with some
amount of Scheme experience.
Hello to you all :)
--
> David Kastrup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
