Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 13:45 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: > Selling LilyPond with vaporware MusicXML makes only sense if we want > to > hook people on LilyPond with the promise that they can take their > scores > into other products eventually. Yes, of course.
> And that promise only makes sense if > managing the scores with LilyPond is advantageous over managing the > scores with whatever is supposed to read its MusicXML in the end. That's what I'm absolutely convinced about by now. I can't imagine anything that beats a workflow with LilyPond, LaTeX and Git to produce a book of sheet music. Maybe it's different for other applications, but for preparing editions this is really awesome. Urs > Because otherwise they could just use what is supposed to handle the > final typesetting anyway. Of course, but that's not the case. > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
