Christ van Willegen <cvwille...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Urs Liska <li...@ursliska.de> wrote: >> Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> Uh, are we still talking about LilyPond? >> Maybe I wasn't clear enough, and maybe this should actually have been >> written in a private email. >> I'm not refering to LilyPond's code base, but to the source code of some >> edition projects we have been talking about recently. >> These should be done in a way so they can serve as examples of >> collaborative editing, and their source code should look organized >> enough so we can show them around as examples. > > Ask Wilbert about the LyBoek project...
Is that a "work title"? The official title is Liedboek, as in <URL:http://www.liedboek.nl/> > 1000 rendered pages of music for people in the churches, plus 1000's > more for choir and piano/organ/guitar/whatnot players. All done in the > course of just a year, IIRC. Well, planning took more, of course, but > note entry was a hugely parallel undertaking, and Git was used for > version tracking. An exposition of the project logistics would be interesting, yes. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
