Anthonys Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> writes: > Indeed, this legal claim (that using functions creates a derivative > work) is exactly the claim that Oracle tried with Android and Java, > and they came a royal cropper with it.
"exactly" in the meaning of "quite the opposite of". Oracle did not try to cover code intended to compile with their Java libraries, but rather tried to prohibit a compatible reimplementation from scratch of the Java code implementing the APIs. So Oracle was trying to prohibit reimplementing the code _behind_ the APIs, whereas we are talking about the implications of the APIs on the code _calling_ them. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
