> No, it's a feature. > Janek Hi Janek,
I first thought that, too. And I still think, the repeated accidental after a line break of a tied note is a feature and good notation practice. But here, I am not sure, because two accidentals in one bar looks a bit exaggerated to me (I would keep the first in the new line and drop the second). I have no reference at hand to verify. But if the current behaviour is really the standard notation, something like the extraNatural switch would be handy: \set extraAccidentalAfterTie = ##f % bad name, just as example If not, this would be worth a bug report. Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
