Adam Spiers <lilypond-u...@adamspiers.org> writes: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:51 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Adam Spiers <lilypond-u...@adamspiers.org> writes: >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>> Adam Spiers <lilypond-u...@adamspiers.org> writes: >>>>> I just blogged about this: >>>>> >>>>> http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/02/25/music-industry-learns-nothing-from-the-avid-sibelius-saga/ >>>> >>>> Well, I see some fatally flawed assumptions here, riding on your >>>> notion "both MuseScore and GNU LilyPond would serve as excellent >>>> starting points for a world-class music notation product." >>>> >>>> Now I can't vouch for MuseScore, but GNU LilyPond is anything but a >>>> "starting point" for software development. It is large with an >>>> elaborate and complex architecture. And most particularly, an >>>> architecture that is not the core expertise of the former Sibelius >>>> development team. >>> >>> I don't follow your logic here at all.
And it is clear that you won't, so we might as well call it a day. Anybody actually interested in the argument has had ample opportunity to make himself acquainted with our reasonings. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
