I agree, too. I do have Sibelius on some computer, but I never use it for notation. For writing down music, it's just too dedious: I write it down on paper. And for typesetting: lilypond is just superior. So Sibelius ends up being used as an overkill midi editor/sequencer. After all I payed quite some money on it. ;-)
However, my workflow typesetting music with lilypond leaves a lot of room for improvements. (For any other possible programs, there aren't any workflows). I wonder whether anybody has got experience with this thing: http://www.arpegemusic.com/mtk.htm I was quite impressed with it on last year's Musikmesse in Frankfurt. However it comes with a proprietary software which, again, is inferior to lilypond. Using xev (x keycode monitoring), it might be possible to write some program which makes this keyboard emit lilypond code. Gabriel On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:39:18AM +0100, Stjepan Horvat wrote: > I agree with Francois. Writing music on paper works for me the best. > Then afterwards i typeset the music into the machine. So when i > typeset the music the easiest way to do this is by entering text and > being 100% sure that it is A and not F or C..After that you just fix > the octave if you failed counting. Perfect. > > Stef. > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Francois Planiol > <alicuota...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dont mind, let Sibelius die... > > > > The question is: who writes music? Thats old fashionned. Use a > > sequencer, or write lead sheets per hand or whatever, but why scores? > > I bet most of people writing music would be happier to write score on > > paper (with indications for copy-paste etc) and have mostly students > > all around to pay them for typing in lily. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
