I agree with Francois. Writing music on paper works for me the best. Then afterwards i typeset the music into the machine. So when i typeset the music the easiest way to do this is by entering text and being 100% sure that it is A and not F or C..After that you just fix the octave if you failed counting. Perfect.
Stef. On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Francois Planiol <alicuota...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dont mind, let Sibelius die... > > The question is: who writes music? Thats old fashionned. Use a > sequencer, or write lead sheets per hand or whatever, but why scores? > I bet most of people writing music would be happier to write score on > paper (with indications for copy-paste etc) and have mostly students > all around to pay them for typing in lily. > > But nevertheless, when Sib has become unuseful, then will come another > propietary software. Looking for others money. Make a product, invest > in a good announcements campaign and this is know for to work. This is > capitalism. > > Freeware is for non-mainstream-people. This is another side of capitalism ;-) > > Francois > > 2013/2/25, Adam Spiers <lilypond-u...@adamspiers.org>: >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Hilary Snaden >> <h...@newearth.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>> On 2013-02-21 19:58, Urs Liska wrote: >>>> >>>> http://blog.steinberg.net/2013/02/welcome/ >>> >>> >>> These from Daniel Spreadbury tell me most, I think, of what I need to >>> know >>> about the new project. >>> >>> "Our application will use a proprietary file format... an open source >>> file >>> format is only any use if you also have a wide range of software that can >>> make use of that format... the Lilypond file format itself does not >>> describe >>> exactly how the finished score will appear..." >>> >>> Thanks, but no thanks. >> >> I just blogged about this: >> >> http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/02/25/music-industry-learns-nothing-from-the-avid-sibelius-saga/ >> >> Like it or not (and I certainly don't), a large proportion of people >> who need to notate music will run away screaming if you explain the >> compilation-based design of LilyPond to them. I think >> >> http://lilypond.org/text-input.html >> >> is absolutely fantastic, but some people's aversion to anything which >> looks at all technical seems unsurmountable to me (although I'd love >> to be proven wrong; after all, I still see "non-technical" airport >> staff happily typing cryptic commands into old-school terminals in >> order to query flight data ...) >> >> So anything we can do as a community to address that part of the >> user-base is very good in my book ... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Nesmotren govori kao da mačem probada, a jezik je mudrih iscjeljenje. Izreke 12:18 _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
