2012/12/18 Arle Lommel <fene...@gmail.com>: > First off, thanks very much, Harm, for taking the time to review my issue and > provide a detailed response, despite the complaint about images. I will work > with it and see how it works out.
Hi Arle, let me express my apology having been impolite again. > Given that, does anyone have any suggestions to how behave nicely for list > members like Harm when images are involved? Sometimes graphics are needed, > and from a user perspective being able to say "like this" is very useful. > Surely if Harm is not alone in filtering them out, I am also not alone in > using current mail clients that don't make the distinction Harm wants me to > make. I'm surely not the only one for whom "DON'T POST INLINE-IMAGES! Attach > them!” is a dictum that cannot be complied with because it is not a > meaningful one in our software. > > Best regards, > > Arle In the past there were some other mails with inline-images, but not mentioning them in the text. So I've never known what the text is about. Well, you could say that's _my_ problem and you would be right. I'd suggest to give a hint that there is sth, though. image1: <what-ever-image> would be nice. Regards, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
