Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> writes: > On 06/07/12 14:49, David Kastrup wrote: >> I don't see that GPLv2 permits additional restrictions to be added to >> the work as a whole. The requirement to make the source available to >> anybody using a service supplied by the software is an additional >> restriction. > > "GPLv2 or later" means that you can interpret the work as being > covered instead by GPLv3,
This is not a question of reinterpretation or optional. You _can't_ license redistributed works under GPLv2 if the work as a whole contains AGPLv3 components. Once you made use of the relicensing and upstream did not, changes from you can't be contributed upstream by anybody else under GPLv2. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
