Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> writes: > On 05/07/12 22:03, David Kastrup wrote: >> It also means bad compatibility with GPL. And a license change. > > What's the "bad compatibility" you have in mind? AGPLv3 is compatible > with any code licensed "GPLv2 or later".
I don't see that GPLv2 permits additional restrictions to be added to the work as a whole. The requirement to make the source available to anybody using a service supplied by the software is an additional restriction. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user