Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> writes:

> On 05/07/12 22:03, David Kastrup wrote:
>> It also means bad compatibility with GPL.  And a license change.
>
> What's the "bad compatibility" you have in mind?  AGPLv3 is compatible
> with any code licensed "GPLv2 or later".

I don't see that GPLv2 permits additional restrictions to be added to
the work as a whole.  The requirement to make the source available to
anybody using a service supplied by the software is an additional
restriction.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to