On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:18 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:

>>> You can't separate the two.  Developers grow from users.  Look at the
>>> TeX/LaTeX and Emacs communities: how much of the changes happen in the
>>> binary, how much in the interpretative layers?  Where did most
>>> developers get their first experiences and contact?
>>
>> Let me try to rephrase things: the more functionality is moved into
>> the Scheme layers, the less people you can find who are capable of
>> working on it.
>
> Among programmers who never heard of LilyPond and acquired their skills
> independently.
>
> But the target audience of LilyPond is not programmers.  It is
> musicians.
>
>> Therefore, you should be careful with moving more and more code into
>> the Scheme layer.
>
> Guess what: I've been programming computers since the seventies, and I
> was a hardcore C++ programmers years before I started on LilyPond.  I
> had not worked with Scheme before LilyPond.

guess what: I learned Scheme because of Lilypond too, but you and I
are the exception.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to