On 31/05/2012, at 8:55 am, David Kastrup wrote:
> Having to cut an argument off in mid-sentence for being able to counter
> it does not exactly overwhelm.
I have always understood it to be good netiquette only to quote exactly what
one is replying to.
> #1 is a shallower dip than #{ return 1 #}.
Shorter, obviously. More elegant, I agree. But conceptually, more abstract
and therefore more difficult; 'deeper', in the sense a mathematician would use
the term.
Best wishes,
Matthew
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
