David Kastrup writes: > Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Reinhold Kainhofer writes: >> >>>> A) Development of ly2xml >>> >>> Reviewers would probably argue that this is not really scientific >>> research and should be funded by an industry partner instead. >> >> Some may even note that the hardest part of this has already been >> prototyped as part of schikkers list and argue Possible === Trivial >> === Worthless ;-) > > Proven possible ==> not a research item. Worthless? Just ask Microsoft > and Apple how worthless it is to repackage existing possibilities and > prototypes.
Possibly, but then you'd have to apply for a marketing/branding oriented grant? -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
