Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> writes: > Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > >>> A) Development of ly2xml >> >> Reviewers would probably argue that this is not really scientific >> research and should be funded by an industry partner instead. > > Some may even note that the hardest part of this has already been > prototyped as part of schikkers list and argue Possible === Trivial > === Worthless ;-)
Proven possible ==> not a research item. Worthless? Just ask Microsoft and Apple how worthless it is to repackage existing possibilities and prototypes. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
