On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:03:01PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" > <gra...@percival-music.ca> > >On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:40:49AM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote: > >Since nobody is willing to either update the files himself, or > >organize other people to do them, there's no point discussing > >matters with the admin. > > I don't recall anyone asking for a volunteer. I'll do it.
You have impressive email filters. does anybody care about LSR? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-06/msg00761.html LSR lovers: walk the walk http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-07/msg00116.html LSR updating to 2.14 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-08/msg00278.html % (somebody offered to handle it, but health issues arose) we need organizers http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-09/msg00265.html hands off LSR and makelsr.py http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-09/msg00247.html oh wait, some of those are probably about the LSR import, rather than updating it to 2.14. The reason I make such a fuss about the bug squad not working is that they are the tip of the iceberg. There are a TON of other maintenance tasks that aren't being done[1]. I've almost completely given up trying to get those happening because the bug squad is the easiest, most clear-cut job we have, and historically even that hasn't gone smoothly. (it does appear to have improved in the past few weeks) [1] such as doing a full LSR import every week. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
