Hi Jean-Alexis, 2012/2/5 Jean-Alexis Montignies <j...@montignies.info>: > >> as remarked here: >> lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-02/msg00177.html >> there are some problems with "polychord-column". >> I changed it to the new "dir-column-line". >> >> But in both cases the chords are aligned with their root. Depending >> whether an accidental is added or not the horizontal line is more or >> less raised (especially when you add \override ChordNames.ChordName >> #'font-size = #6 or sth like that to enlarge the ChordNames). >> I'm not sure how it _should_ look, what do you think? >> >> Regards, >> Harm >> <polychordsDemo-rev-01.ly><polychordsDemo-rev-01.png>_______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > It sure does look even better! > > To be perfect, we should add some thickness to the line. I could look into > that next time I'm doing a score with polychords. > Anyway, I think your code should be in the snippets and it has more uses that > just polychords ! :) > > Thanks! > > Jean-Alexis
on purpose to add it to the LSR I tried to downgrade the functions to "2.12.12", but I failed. :( Do you think it makes sense to add them anyway, using the [needs LSR upgrade]-feature? They will not be approved or listed until the LSR is upgraded. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
