W dniu 31 stycznia 2011 17:06 użytkownik Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> napisał: > On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, "Jan Warchoł" <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2011/1/24 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> >>> >>> If you use >>> >>> #(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary) >>> then you get the parenthesised accidental automatically, as requested. >> >> Indeed, thanks for the remainder. >> However, in my opinion it is necessary to *change* the 'default', >> 'voice' and 'forget' accidental styles, because their current >> behaviour result in wrongly typeset music. If the last note in the >> following example doesn't get a natural, it's *impossible* to tell >> that it's not another ces: >> >> ces'1~ | ces' >> ces'1( | c') >> >> It may be argued that the slur looks different than the tie, but it's >> not enough. >> I'm sure that engraving books will agree with me - may someone check this? > > I think that it would be fine to have a rule added that says "if we're > across a barline, and the scale step is the same, but the accidental is > different, and the slur is two notes long ending on the current note, > display a cautionary accidental in order to avoid confusion with a tie."
+1, except that i think it should be unparenthesized (at least in accidental styles like default and voice, that don't use parenthesized accidentals at all). 2011/1/31 Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de>: > But IMHO the important point here is the fact that the notation can be > ambigous without the accidental, and is definitely clear with it. No > matter if ? or !. +1. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
