hello
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:14:23 +0100
To: Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com>
Cc: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org>, bug-lilypond
<bug-lilyp...@gnu.org>, lilypond-devel <lilypond-de...@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in ties over barlines
>By the way: if you have { r2.. cis8( | c2!) r2 } all over the place,
>and then there suddenly comes a { r2 cis2~ | cis2 r2 }, you'd expect an
>additional sharp there too, don't you?
Hmm...why not use (in your example) { r2.. cis8( | c2?) r2 } which to me
makes more sense. After all, assuming you are in C-major here then why
would you NOT use a cautionary than a regular accidental. In this case you
would NOT need to put the additional sharp in your second example.
No one (as I can see) has spoken about the ? Vs ! And I think that's the
difference for me. It depends on what is already sharp/flat in the key
signature as a musician. ! Means it isn't and ? Means it is but 'be aware'
right?
James
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
