On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Keith E OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > Please don't ask the poor users to learn another new concept, if we can > extend what they have learned already.
Sure, let's ask them to use dirty hacks instead. That should work well :-) More seriously, if this enhancement were added (which is unlikely at this point, anyway), the goal would be to improve LilyPond's *default* behaviour, not to require users to change the syntax they use. Now, if power-users happen to want to modify the new behavior (and even possibly disable it), they should *also* have be presented with the ability to do it. What is wrong with that? Yours Pondly, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
