Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> writes: > On 10/22/2010 04:51 PM, Éditions IN NOMINE wrote: >> Well, well, well, who would like to typeset some Reger ? :-D > > Looks like a recent (hardcoded in the C++) transposition rule rewriting > any accidental greater in magnitude than a double-sharp or flat may have > to be revisited ...
Why? It is sort of pointless to reach notes by transposition that could not be entered directly, anyway. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
