On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:06:26 +0200, James Wilkinson <ji...@cs.cofc.edu>
wrote:
On 10/11/10 5:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once.
thus
you:
1) save typing
2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time guessing obvious
things
and it can concentrate on the big stuff :)
you just need to create a third voice with spacers and all the common
marks, in parallel with the other two:
I'm not at all certain that's a good idea. The dynamics won't be
present in MIDI (which is probably no great loss), but more
importantly, it messes up the semantics for no particularly good
reason.
8-(
When I first brought this up, that answer seemed to be the consensus, so
I gave it a go. Now I don't know what to do. If there's a better way,
I'd love to hear it.
Or am I back to my original idea of having Lilypond remove the duplicate
dynamic marks on its own?
thanks
for me it's still a good idea. you have two voices sharing the same
dynamics. probably there's other way, but it definitely works for me, and
lilypond allows it. not such a big deal I think.
greetings,
Vicente
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
