On 10/11/10 5:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote:
On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote:
if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus
you:
1) save typing
2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time guessing obvious things
and it can concentrate on the big stuff :)
you just need to create a third voice with spacers and all the common
marks, in parallel with the other two:
I'm not at all certain that's a good idea. The dynamics won't be
present in MIDI (which is probably no great loss), but more
importantly, it messes up the semantics for no particularly good
reason.
8-(
When I first brought this up, that answer seemed to be the consensus, so
I gave it a go. Now I don't know what to do. If there's a better way,
I'd love to hear it.
Or am I back to my original idea of having Lilypond remove the duplicate
dynamic marks on its own?
thanks
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jimmy Wilkinson | Professor Emeritus of Computer Science
ji...@cs.cofc.edu | The College of Charleston
(843) 953-8160 | Charleston SC 29424
http://www.cs.cofc.edu/~jimmy
If there is one word to describe me, that word would have to be
"profectionist".
Any form of incompitence is an athema to me.
Metathesis??? Don't ax me.
Just between you and I, the grammar used by Americans are getting worse.
I can only help but wonder what the cause of this might be.
It just ceases to amaze me how it could be the case, but mostly I could
care less.
...... boat storage under house with wench ......
I won't get into specifics because that was between he and I
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
