The first version only has stable links, but the box looked a bit too small. Also, other open-source projects proudly display their development version numbers... even though we don't want innocent users trying out devel versions (we prefer corrupted users for that :), I think it's still nice to have that info around.
The "docs" link just takes you to the main Documentation page, which will have a link to download the docs (either as html or pdf)... yes, I still need to add a stub for that. ... oh, wait a moment. Were you suggesting that we should use the word "manuals" instead of "docs" ? That's a good point; the words *do* have different connotations. I'll take a look at how this could come into play. Cheers, - Graham On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:26:33AM +0200, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: > - Why include the unstable version on the homepage? > - I would organize it as "Latest version: 2.12.3" in the head block of > the download box, and just have a "Download" and a "Download manuals" as > the links. (Actually while LilyPond has documentation, people like > manuals more, and thanks to GDP, we have very good ones.) > > Bert > > Graham Percival wrote: >> Here you go: >> http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html >> >> Cheers, >> - Graham >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> >> > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
