Am 16.07.2008 um 21:20 schrieb Patrick Horgan:
I believe the truth is more along the lines of duckling imprinting--
you know that ducklings imprint on whatever moves first and think
that that thing, duck, dog or person, is mommy. We do the same
with whatever editor we learned well enough to work with first. For
me it was vi. I've learned emacs several times in my life and am
able to use it effectively right after relearning it, but the whole
time, I yearn for vi. I don't make the mistake of saying vi is
better, nor emacs or kate or whatever. If it does the job, and you
like it best, then it's the best for you. (Actually vi is better
<grin;>).
Patrick
I think any of these arguments are funny, I've had the pleasure to
watch a couple. Honestly, the only reason I use an editor is for
lilypond. In fact, until I was forced to use an editor because of the
10.5 intel problem, I didn't even know what an editor was. I use nano.
It gets the job done, and I don't have to learn an editor :)
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
